Director
European Patent Attorney
UK Patent Attorney
UK Design Attorney
MSci Physics, Imperial College London
PhD, Photonics, Imperial College London
Postgraduate Certificate in Intellectual Property, Bournemouth University
Thank you
Emma graduated from Imperial College London in 2009 with a master's degree in Physics, before continuing her studies in the field and at Imperial College by undertaking a PhD in the Photonics Group, followed by a year and a half as a Research Assistant. During this time her research focused on the development of high power diode pumped solid state lasers, using both end-pumped and side-pumped geometries, for use in medical and industrial applications in particular.
Emma decided to make the jump from research into the patent profession in 2015 when she joined the Engineering team at Keltie. Since then, she has worked to support a range of small and large clients, spanning sectors and technologies that include automotive, subsea engineering, optics and photonics, and packaging. Emma has experience in both drafting and prosecution of patent applications, as well as in the filing of design rights in Europe and the US in particular. In addition to her time working for clients from the Keltie offices, Emma has also had the opportunity to undertake an in-house secondment where she was involved in both patent prosecution and invention harvesting.
Emma qualified as a UK patent and design attorney in 2021.
06.11.2025
Interview with PlanOpSim: Accelerating the Future of Optical Metasurface DesignWe spoke with CEO and co-founder Lieven Penninck about the origins of PlanOpSim, how artificial intelligence is reshaping photonics development, and why simulation software must sit at the intersection of physics, accuracy, and manufacturability.
12.08.2025
Edwards vs Meril case at the Unified Patent CourtIn this article, Molly Yau looks at the Edwards vs Meril case at the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and explores its procedural implications. Molly draws on her academic background and long-standing interest in cardiovascular devices to introduce key technical details of the case - which relates to implantable prosthetic heart valves and delivery systems - and highlights the decision’s significance for UPC practice.
OtherLess related knowledge
Thank you
