UK
Keltie LLP,
Watermoor Point (Room 219)
Watermoor Road
Cirencester,
Gloucestershire,
GL7 1LF,
United Kingdom
Thank you
Cirencester gives us a perfect base for clients in the West of England and Wales, being particularly convenient for the Midlands and the West Country. Our people there provide an extension of our London team and remain regular visitors to our London office.
Our Cirencester office is just 13 miles from Swindon and Gloucester and within walking distance of Cirencester town centre.
It is located off the A429 Bristol Road, with easy access to the M5 and M4, and London is only 75 minutes away by train from the nearby Kemble station.
If arriving by taxi, ask the driver for 'Watermoor Point on Watermoor Road'.
Security demands that we receive visitors strictly by prior appointment. Appointments can be made outside normal business hours on request.
Parking at Cirencester office park
Car parking is available for visitors at the Cirencester Office Park.
Security demands that we receive visitors strictly by prior appointment.
Cirencester office park by public transport
Direct trains run from London Paddington to nearby Kemble station every two hours, with more regular options which include a change.
From there it is a short taxi-ride, ask the driver for 'Cirencester Office Park on Tetbury Road'.
An alternative options is travelling to Swindon which is then a 25 minute taxi-ride to the offices.
04.11.2024
T 56/21 – A missed opportunity for providing legal certainty on adapting the description at the EPOIt is typically a requirement at the EPO to amend the description for conformity with the allowable claims before grant of a patent; however, there have been a number of diverging decisions on the matter. The latest decision finds that there is no legal basis for enforcing this requirement, which might suggest that it will no longer be necessary to adapt the description. However, there are other decisions which support the requirement to adapt the description. In view of this, and because the Board of Appeal in this case opted not to involve the highest authority at the EPO in order to clarify the situation, it is unclear as to whether or not the requirement to adapt the description will remain.
Thank you
